Remember the good old days when you knew where you were with ITV dramas? Basically you tuned in to watch Ross Kemp/Martin Kemp/Robson Green play a cop/soldier/criminal/lawyer/doctor. Recently, the envelope has been pushed almost to the point of originality, but with ‘The Jury’ we’re back on familiar ground. Superior in terms of production, of-course – Peter Morgan, Julie Walters and a smart 5-night airing, plus the sort of mournful humming soundtrack that all but sings depth and gravity – but if Julie Walters had wanted a vehicle, she need have looked no further. She single-handedly demolishes the opposition in defending her previously-convicted client’s retrial. We’ve no doubt the law works by shaking the foundations of so-called evidence, but as a jury member we’d say it still looked overwhelmingly like Lane was the man. Even if he turns out not to be, would it be thanks to his terrier lawyer?
The eponymous jury are worthy to be called his peers. One is contemplating an affair through a dating agency, another is pregnant by a teenaged pupil, and a third is impersonating the juror called to serve, in collusion with her to gain a promotion. There’s also a sub-plot involving a mystery woman who claims she served on the jury who convicted Lane in his original trial. Performances are polished, and it’s intriguing enough to keep you watching, but it’s going to have to cohere into a convincing, emotionally-involving climax to have been worthwhile. We're not sure it works as stand-alone drama. Stand-alone, that is, from the previous series of 'The Jury', which despite featuring a different trial and, of-course, different jurors, continues with a format similar to that of a disaster movie: group of characters all have either cliched or unlikely backstories that intersect or are resolved in some way by the situation.
No comments:
Post a Comment